Hunger and obesity now coexist. Here’s how food systems, policy, and education can deliver nutrient-dense diets and curb the global double burden of malnutrition.
Hunger used to be defined by too few calories. Today, the nutrition crisis is more complex: billions consume enough energy yet lack essential nutrients, while obesity rises in the same communities where undernutrition persists. This “double burden” reflects food systems that supply cheap, energy-dense products but not enough vegetables, whole grains, and quality proteins. Drawing on recent research and field initiatives, this article explains the scale of the problem, why food systems matter, and which measures—from farming to fiscal policy, from early-life feeding to food skills—can shift diets toward truly nutrient-dense foods.
The new face of malnutrition: one problem, two extremes
The world’s nutrition challenge is no longer a simple deficit of calories. In many low- and middle-income countries—and pockets of wealthier ones—undernutrition and obesity now appear side by side. A child can start life stunted due to poor maternal diets and low-quality complementary foods, only to become an overweight adult when exposed to abundant, low-cost ultra-processed foods. The epidemiological consequences are stark: poor diets are linked to more deaths than tobacco, mainly through cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and some cancers—evidence that diet quality, not just quantity, determines health outcomes. Recent global estimates show tens of millions of children still stunted, while childhood overweight is no longer confined to affluent settings. For practitioners in public health nutrition, the message is clear: we must address the full continuum of malnutrition with coherent policies that promote protective dietary patterns—more fruit and vegetables, whole grains and legumes, nuts, and minimally processed staples—while reducing excess salt, sugar, unhealthy fats, and refined carbohydrates.
What the latest data tells us
Data compiled by international agencies show the persistence of child stunting alongside a rise in overweight, even within the same regions. The reality is dynamic: some countries have made gains on undernutrition yet are now grappling with rapidly growing obesity and diet-related diseases. Progress has also slowed for key child nutrition indicators after decades of improvement, underscoring how fragile gains can be when food prices spike or health systems are strained. For policymakers and buyers, the numbers point to one priority: improving dietary quality at population scale. That means investing in supply chains for vegetables, pulses, and whole grains; ensuring safe water and sanitation; and protecting infant and young child feeding from predatory marketing. Reliable monitoring—household surveys, retail sales data, and biomarker studies—must track both micronutrient deficiencies and excess calorie intake to guide course corrections.
How food systems fuel the paradox
Dietary patterns are shaped less by personal willpower than by what food environments make easy and affordable. Over the last two decades, manufacturing, distribution, and retail have made high-sugar drinks, salty snacks, and ready-to-eat products ubiquitous and inexpensive, while healthy options remain costlier or less convenient. Urbanization amplifies the shift, as time-pressed households gravitate toward shelf-stable, aggressively marketed items. Reforming these incentives is the heart of a systems response. That includes agricultural policy (what we subsidize and research), trade and processing (which raw materials become profitable products), pricing and labeling (how costs and information are presented), and marketing controls (especially to children). Without reshaping these levers, appeals to “eat better” will be outgunned by the economics of the current supply.
Growing better: vegetables, pulses, and resilient staples
Nutrition begins on the farm. Programs that boost vegetable production and cut post-harvest losses—supported by organizations such as the World Vegetable Center—improve access to diverse, affordable produce while creating income for smallholders, especially women. In semi-arid regions, promoting millets and sorghum has proved effective: these crops are drought-tolerant, deliver fiber and minerals, and diversify local diets. The “Smart Food” approach championed by agricultural research networks reframes these grains as modern, desirable foods, not “birdseed.” Such strategies align nutrition with climate resilience and farm economics—core principles of agroecology. To scale impact, governments can underwrite cold chains and storage, seed systems for diverse varieties, and local processing that turns perishable harvests into value-added products (flours, mixes, vegetable powders), extending availability across seasons.
Money matters: fiscal policy that nudges healthier choices
Price signals shape consumption. The UK’s Soft Drinks Industry Levy is a well-studied example: by taxing beverages above sugar thresholds, it pushed manufacturers to reformulate. The result was large reductions in sugar sold from soft drinks without shrinking market volume—evidence that a sugary drinks tax can shift supply as well as demand. Similar tools—tiered excise taxes, front-of-pack warning labels, marketing restrictions for children—change the retail landscape in favor of healthier options. On the demand side, targeted subsidies work. Conditional cash transfer programs that pair food support with nutrition education have improved household food security and diet quality. In high-income settings, benefits that specifically incentivize fruit and vegetable purchases can tilt baskets toward healthier profiles. The design details matter: tiered taxes spur reformulation; dedicated produce incentives—rather than across-the-board subsidies—maximize nutrition per public euro.
Regulating what we eat—and how it’s sold
Beyond price, rules on labeling and marketing are powerful. Clear, standardized front-of-pack systems help busy shoppers compare products at a glance and discourage misleading health claims. Restrictions on advertising unhealthy foods to children reduce exposure at the most impressionable ages. Public procurement leverages the state’s purchasing power: schools, hospitals, and social programs can anchor markets for healthier staples and minimally processed foods, stabilizing demand for farmers and signaling norms for the private sector. None of this replaces education, but it creates an environment where informed choices are also affordable and convenient.
The first 1,000 days: breastfeeding and early feeding
Preventing malnutrition starts before birth. Protecting and promoting breastfeeding reduces infections in infancy and lowers later-life risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes. The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative—anchored in the Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding—has repeatedly been shown to raise initiation and exclusive breastfeeding rates when properly implemented. Yet support cannot stop at discharge. Paid maternity protections, enforcement of the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes, and community counseling all matter. Complementary feeding from six months should emphasize diverse, iron-rich foods—pulses, eggs where culturally acceptable, leafy greens, vitamin-A-rich produce—prepared safely with clean water. In food-insecure settings, fortified complementary foods and micronutrient powders can bridge gaps, provided they do not crowd out efforts to build sustainable access to fresh, local staples.
Investing in farmers and food entrepreneurs
For food systems to deliver quality at scale, smallholders and local processors need capital, training, and market access. Blended-finance vehicles that back nutrition-positive enterprises—cold-storage start-ups, women-led processing cooperatives, biofortified seed multipliers—can unlock private investment where commercial banks see too much risk. Public research should prioritize nutrient-rich crops, stress-tolerant varieties, and affordable post-harvest technologies. Extension services, often overlooked, are a high-return channel to spread safe storage, integrated pest management, and soil-health practices—foundations for reliable supplies of nutrient-dense foods. These investments create rural jobs, shorten supply chains, and make wholesome items price-competitive with heavily processed alternatives.
Food skills: turning access into healthier plates
Access does not automatically translate into better diets. Culinary education closes the loop. Community cooking classes have helped low-income families shop on a budget and prepare tasty, balanced meals from affordable staples. In rural Guatemala, nutrition rehabilitation programs teach families to cook the vegetables they grow for export, transforming availability into actual intake. In urban settings, teaching basic techniques—batch-cooking beans and whole grains, assembling quick vegetable-forward meals, reading labels—pays dividends. Schools are ideal venues: gardens, hands-on cooking, and standards for school meals build lifelong habits. When paired with cash or produce incentives, education accelerates changes in purchasing and preparation.
Measure what matters, then scale what works
The double burden will not yield to silver bullets. But a coherent package—more diverse crops, smarter pricing, strong early-life support, fair finance for farmers, and practical food education—can bend the curve. To keep momentum, governments should track a concise dashboard: intake of fruit and vegetables, whole grains and legumes, exposure to ultra-processed foods, breastfeeding rates, and prevalence of key micronutrient deficiencies. Tie these indicators to budgets and procurement, and make results public. When we reward the right outcomes, supply chains adjust. For the hospitality, retail, and food-service sectors, the opportunity is to lead: reformulate menus toward nutrient-dense foods, celebrate resilient staples, and market flavor rather than sugar. Feeding well—not just more—is the only sustainable route out of the nutrition paradox.
Cook in France is your independant source for food in France.